Let’s talk about movies: Wonder Woman (2017) is not wonderful, but enjoyable

September 10, 2017

By Eddy Montilla

Rating: 6.4/10

Directed by: Patty Jenkins

Written by: Allan Heinberg, Zack Snyder and Jason Fuchs

Genre: Action, adventure and science fiction

MPAA PG-13 (Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. Parents are urged to be cautious. Some material may be inappropriate for pre-teenagers.)

Starring: Gal Gadot (as Diana) and Chris Pine (as Steve Trevor)

Running Time: 141 minutes

In the field of politics and economy, History may repeat itself, first as tragedy, second as farce, but in Hollywood only as business. No wonder that by now many superhero movies, as pure business, have been thriving even though its saturation point is about to be reached. You will probably receive an affirmative answer if you ask a middle-aged person if he or she read the comics or saw the American television series, The New Adventures of Wonder Woman (1975-1979), starring Lynda Carter (Diana, Wonder Woman) and Lyle Waggoner (as Steve Trevor) because as many others of his or her generation, people really enjoyed it.

What makes this particularly intriguing is why these present superhero films do not make a deep impression on that generation. Perhaps, this might be attributable to the fact that in the past, superheroes were much closer to us, humanly speaking, and their actions could be “mentally digested” easily, which makes a marked contrast compared to today’s superheroes who destroy everything in fractions of seconds and can rebuild it as a jigsaw in the same amount of time. That explains why we liked Gal Gadot (as Diana, Wonder Woman) since she left her island of Themyscira alongside the mighty Amazons to try to save the world with her sword, shield, bracelets of victory and the Lasso of Truth during World War I.

The world of cinema is crammed with male superheroes, so the presence of a woman sells the female superhero movie like hotcakes, not only for men who delight in watching the beauty of Wonder Woman, but for many women too because they see her as their representative. Gal Gadot’s work is not bad, and if we cannot praise her better is just because the plot is too weak that ends up reducing the result of her performance. The same can be said about Chris Pine’s job. That can be seen at the end of the movie when Travor sacrificed himself by shooting the bombs inside the bomber plane to bring it down. Another end like Armageddon (1998) except for the absence of Bruce Willis. With ends like this one, it is very difficult for actors to do a good job and for movie reviewers to give them the credit that really deserve. There are, however, funny moments, especially those related to the way Diana discovers men and women relationships. In short, Wonder Woman (2017) does not fall into the category of a must-watch movie in my opinion, but cannot be listed as mediocre either.

This article was originally published in the digital newspaper World And Opinion.

Copyright 2017 littlethings4all.wordpress.com. All rights are reserved.

Advertisements

Let’s talk about movies: Hacksaw Ridge (2016) fought and won its own war to be unique in its kind

July 22, 2017

By Eddy Montilla.

Rating: 8.3/10

Directed by: Mel Gibson.

Written by: Andrew Knight and Robert Schenkkan.

Genre: War.

MPAA R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian. Contains some adult material. Parents are urged to learn more about the film before taking their young children with them.).

Starring: Andrew Garfield (as Desmond T. Doss), Hugo Weaving (as Tom Doss), Vince Vaughn (as Sergeant Howell), Sam Worthington (as Captain Glover), Matthew Nable (as Lt. Cooney)…

Running Time: 139 minutes.

Most of the war movies made every year are like a toilet roll: Important, but with dubious values. Among the few honorable exceptions that come to mind, I can cite All quiet on the Western Front (1930), The bridge on the river Kwai (1957), Schindler’s list (1993), Saving private Ryan (1998) and Letters from Iwo Jima (2006). Mel Gibson’s Hacksaw Ridge (2016) is fighting and winning its own war to be added to this list for Gibson’s ability to detect two different approaches, very little exploited in the genre of war, and master them in a remarkable way.

First: In an era of omnipotent superheroes, big macho men and stars with inexhaustible physical strength, Desmond Doss (Andrew Garfield), a conscientious objector, is a weak constitution soldier, to be more precise, the only unfit soldier in his unit for his refusal to shoot and hold a rifle, which turns him into the most likely candidate to be one of the first war dead in that combat. At the end, Doss showed to be the bravest man, a soldier who spent the night inside the enemy camp saving the lives of American combatants and even some Japanese soldiers too. His almost trademark expression: “Give me one more, Lord”, “One more”, referring to his plea for strength in order to rescue the wounded can make you shudder even if you boast about your impassive heart.

Second: A lot of movie directors have bared soldier’s feelings in the battlefield and have showed them trying to use their religious convictions as a shield or source of strength while they are killing paradoxically “the enemies”. We have also seen movies with pacifists looking for solutions to the conflict from a comfortable place out of the war zone. In Hacksaw Ridge (2016), you will see something completely different: Doss, a man whose integrity bind him to the idea of serving his country in the First World War in Okinawa and his faith in God bind him to the principle against killing another human being. During the film, Doss has to find a way to make both aspects coexist in harmony, not inside a church, but among bullets and flamethrowers.

Except for some excessive bloody scenes that can make some people squeamish and the last shots of Doss on a stretcher that made him look as the average mortal descending down the ridge first to show him as a mystic ascending into heaven later, I took off my hat to director Mel Gibson for being the creator of this work of art. As for Andrew Garfield’s performance, it was so good that the classic adjectives used to describe and qualify in these cases fall short. A great movie full of emotions that will keep your mouth open for almost two hours.

This article was originally published in the digital newspaper World And Opinion.

Copyright 2017 littlethingsforall.wordpress.com. All rights are reserved.


Let’s talk about movies: The Magnificent Seven (2016) is far from being magnificent, but it’s still good

February 17, 2017

By Eddy Montilla.

Cinema seat and pop corn facing empty movie screen

Rating: 6.8/10

Directed by: Antoine Fuqua.

Written by: John Lee Hancock, Nic Pizzolatto and Richard Wenk.

Genre: Action, Western.

MPAA Rating: PG-13 (parents are urged to be cautious. Some material may be inappropriate for pre-teenagers).

Starring: Chisolm (Denzel Washington), Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard), Emma Cullen (Halley Bennet)…

Running Time: 133 minutes.

I am no great friend of remakes, reworking or movies based on books because you have not bought your ticket yet and you know what will happen already. So, this time, instead of talking about the plot, no matter if you can speak Japanese or cannot, I recommend you to see the original version, The Seven Samurais by Akira Kurosawa (七人の侍) or The Magnificent Seven (1960) so that I can save time to talk about the most important part of the movie: Denzel Washington.

    Denzel Washington is an old oak from the old school who does not need to be praised for a particular acting at this point of his life. His mere presence is enough to make from a simple movie something worth seeing. If these days we don’t see him in the film world as frequent as we did in the past, the reason is as simple as pathetic: Connoisseurs and lovers of good actors are “endangered species” like the gorilla beringei beringei, engulfed by the acephalous mass, by a headless large crowd of people fed by Hollywood with the actors they ask: body builders and curvaceous girls with big breasts.

    Denzel Washington’s greatness transcends his excellent film acting to reach the social sphere. No actor has fought more than Denzel Washington through his movies for the defense of U.S. blacks’ rights. Even in this film, where you can find humour, dramatic qualities and, a lot of action, of course, the best part of it is precisely at the end when Chilsolm (Denzel Washington) talks about the nightmare his family had to go through and shows his neck.

This article was originally published in the digital newspaper World And Opinion.

Copyright 2017 littlethings4all.wordpress.com. All rights are reserved.